The exact definition of e-cigarette has been widely debated upon by those who would like to give the public a general and universal concept of the device. Likewise, the real side effects of the use e-cig have not been fully documented and categorically outlined. There are those, for example, who say that the e-cigarette is not harmful, and in fact, very helpful to those who would like to quit tobacco smoking. Likewise, there are medical experts who say that the e-cigarette is similarly harmful to smokers in the same way that cigarette is detrimental to the health of its users. Even a cursory look into the Wikipedia definition of the e-cigarette would give you a very muddled idea of the real concept and effects of e-cigarette. This confusion may be due to the fact that there is a dearth of studies regarding the long-term effects of the use of e-cigar on the health and well-being of its users. In fact, if you are going to read some of the articles written about e-cig, you will be greatly annoyed and irritated at the lack of conciseness and precision in their contents. If you are a guy who loves and values the importance of definition and who would like to know precisely the effects of e-cigs, you will be very frustrated after reading those articles, and you will certainly utter to yourself that most articles on e-cigarettes are poorly wrought. Sources on the definition and explanation of e-cig would even claim that “there are no adverse effects ever reported yet on the continuous use of e-cigarettes.” This statement is basically a piece of crap for the conscientious and scrupulous guy. How can you, for example, understand and discover Kanger tanks’ disadvantages and advantages, if all that you could ever read about the Kanger tanks are explicative of how beneficial the device are? You will surely not get the exact advantages and disadvantages of the device if most of the articles on e-cig device are highly generalized without giving weight to scientific findings on the effects of e-cigs on your health.
Say for instance, in one article about the chemicals found in the cartridges of e-cigs, it is stated that “there are over forty carcinogens in the traditional tobacco products among the thousands of chemicals in tobacco.” Yet, the same source would state that “none of these chemicals have yet been found in the vapor of most e-cigarette.” Statements, like the abovementioned statement, are oblique and don’t give you a new slant into the real effects and side-effects of the use of e-cig. All you get out of such presuppositions are mere guesswork which doesn’t hold any water or value at all for consumers and “would-be” consumers. Likewise, the abovementioned statements don’t categorically give you an answer to most of your concerns about the effects of e-cigarette. Moreover, there are articles on e-cigarette which don’t categorically delineate the sources of their information and the necessary studies to back up their obtuse claims. With all these articles and concepts floating around, most users and “would-be” users are readily misled, and would end up more confused than before about the effects of the long-term use of e-cigarette.